26th May 2010 22:44
Steve,
No sorry mate, I only took video.
Checking the raw video quality, it isn't that great... The resolution is only 640x480. No frames where you can recognise anyone. Here are a few of the better ones.
Did all turn out well for the patient?
Regards,
Alan
26th May 2010 20:02
Hi Mate,
I was the winch operator on the helicopter, would you happen to have any still photo's of the job?
Cheers,
Steve.
24th May 2010 13:34
LOL Alan, you know me too well... I didn't use the video footage, rather the audio. I was looking at the spectrogram in baudline last night. Can't remember the figure, about 250 RPM IIRC. I'll post a spectrogram later.
24th May 2010 13:14
Cool. I'm surprised you haven't done a calculation of the heli's rotor speed given the frequency of the cameras frame rate. :)
-A.
Leave a comment on this article.
1st June 2010 09:43
Critical Alpha wrote ...
G'day Alan,
nice video. It's interesting that you put the noise down to turbine noise. There's been a fair amount of research on this and I think it's reliable to say that the majority of the noise doesn't come from the turbine, instead coming from the rotors and the gearbox. The latter source is a major source of noise - and of crew hearing loss, a subject near to my own ageing ears! during those evolutions the main rotor would have been at high collective pitch/high angle of attack therefore adding to its contribution to the noise.
Here's a quote from the UK CAA, which doesn't however point to the gearbox:
"The noise “signature” of helicopters differs significantly from that of fixed wing aircraft. The noise comes more from the main and tail rotors - particularly from their tips - and proportionately less from the engines."
It would be interesting to calculate the angular velocity of the blade tips, using your estimate of 250RPM for the rotors. Tip speed is a major limitation of helicopter performance. The advancing blade tip speed is a combination of it's angular velocity and the speed of advance of the helicopter...
Nice post, thanks.
CA