Comments are moderated before they will appear on the website, this is a manual process and may take some time. Please be patient.
Author Name is a required field.
Email Address is optional, but without one I won't be able to contact you back. It is never shown or linked on the website. You can always just email me if you'd rather not post a public comment. I generally reply in-line with a comment rather than email you back, unless I want to discuss something in private or off topic. Please check back to see when I reply.
Website URL is optional, if supplied the Author Name will be hyperlinked to this URL.
You may use wikitext in the body, preview may be handy here. Don't worry if you can't figure them out, just give me a hint what you want linked to what and I'll do it during moderation. Wikitext is not BBcode!
Spammers: Please don't bother wasting your time scripting up posts to this form. Everything is moderated, your post will never be seen on the web even transiently, there is no way to even view it by its internal ID, it will never be indexed. I will simply delete your post in the moderation interface. If I'm your target audience you're really on the wrong track; I'll never click on a URL in your garbage. The post content is not emailed to me (and I don't use a Win32 mail client anyway), I view the posts in plain text in the moderation interface so no clever tricks of any kind will make anything you type be interpreted by anything other than me, a human. Just give up and go elsewhere please!
13th October 2008 07:57
Alan
Looking at your multimeter RF Power load and detector, it occurred to me that there is a possibility for putting the load box and detector in the probe end and just sending DC through a cable to the DVM. Would not this help with VHF and possibly higher frequency accuracy? Of course the load resistors would have to be hefty enough to avoid excess heat in a hand-held dummy-load RF probe.
Arv
_._
24th June 2008 13:19
Doug,
The code isn't anything special, it just dumps out the Peak and RMS voltages for various dBm values from limits that are hard-coded. It doesn't automatically compensate for the diode drop, but at large levels (about +10 dBm and above) the calibrated device is almost perfectly:
Watts = (Vmeasured + 0.1)^2/100
The 0.1 volt drop factor is fairly insignificant above +30 dBm.
I recently had it calibrated against a precision generator at a calibrate-a-thon the local Homebrew Group ran. It is quite accurate to at least 200 MHz which is surprising considering the resistors I used. The good news is that the DC calibration was accurate to within 2% at HF down to -10 dBm, and quite respectable down to -20 dBm. Even if all you have is a bench PSU the results should be OK.
Its limits are about -20 dBm where the output is only about 6 mV, and it can transiently survive +43 dBm which is limited by the resistors' power handling at which point the output voltage will be about 47 volts.
Anyway, I've converted the program into a PHP script and put it up in the calculators here. I guess I should add the option to change the Zo and pick the range and granularity... The source code is available here.
How did you linearise the 555 ramp? I was thinking of a JFET or PNP as a current source in the cap charging circuit, that should do the trick. The varicap itself is still a problem of course.
24th June 2008 05:06
Hi Alan. A buddy of mine just built a simple power meter like the above circuit but on the back of a 100 ua meter movement. When I saw that you made a program that corrolated DC voltages, peak and RMS AC on a chart I was sure hoping that I might be able to get that from you. He is at a point that he only has a variable voltage bench power supply for calibrating. I am also still working on my version of your sweep generator and made a simple mod to the 555 sawtooth gen for a linear ramp. CU Soon, 73's, Doug..
13th October 2008 11:34
Alan Yates wrote...